Nutrition Notes Economics of Mud and Value of Bedding Facebook Twitter LinkedIn I have written and spoken many times about the importance of bedding and keeping yards groomed the best we can, but the weather in December 2015 was so horrendous for environmental impact, I felt compelled to do it yet again. We all know that mud has a drastic impact on feed conversion and the subsequent effect on ADG, but the table below highlights just how bad mud affects these parameters. Feedlot Efficiency Mud Effect Mud depth, In 3 6 12 18 % Increase Maintenance 7.2 10.1 36.9 79 ADG 3.34 3.09 2.45 1.68 DMI 21.3 20.5 18.9 17.2 F/G 6.39 6.65 7.71 10.21 Cost of Gain $/cwt 64 66.5 77 102 This is not an actual trial, but increases in maintenance requirements have been measured based on mud depth. So those effects were applied to a theoretical group of cattle with the measured performance for the first group shown here. We also realize that no feed yard would have 18 inches of mud across the whole pen, but the point is to show how the progression is more than a linear response. Also, the cost of gain may not be numerically correct depending on your area, but the relative differences are what’s important. Moral of the story, move snow as much as you can and push mud and manure up in a pile even if you can’t haul it out. To combat mud, we have to bed. I realize when it is snowing into a soupy yard, trying to bed seems futile. The trick is to bed early in the winter and establish a bed pack so you have a base to work with before the soup gets deep. The table below shows results of a two-year study done at North Dakota State University several years ago. It should be noted this was under NORMAL winter conditions and not the extreme mess we had this year in December. Table 2 As you can see, the excuse that if I bed, the cattle drop off feed, is not valid. The key is to bed consistently and not just when the pens get sloppy. So if our stalks to bed cost $100/ton to purchase, get in and out of the pen, we are spending 5 cents/lb for bedding. That makes the daily cost in treatments 2 and 3, 17.5 and 27.5 cents/head/day, respectively. The response is .8-lb ADG, which at $125/cwt fat cattle translates into a $1/day response to pay for the bedding. So you can see that even if we have to bed at three times the 3.5 lb/day level, we are still only investing 53 cents for a $1 return. The question isn’t “can I afford to bed?” but rather “can I afford not to bed?” Download PDF Related Nutrition Notes Derecho Damaged Corn The Derecho damaged an estimated 40 million acres of farm landing, laying fields of corn bent and broken, if not completely flat. This article investigates designing and using cattle grazing… Read More Kent Performance Primer When stress happens it often impacts livestock in more than one way, such as feed intake, maintenance requirements, and even health status. Learn how Kent Performance Primer has proved successful… Read More The NutriVantage® / Optaflexx® Advantage After observing the positive effects of NutriVantage on overall feedlot performance we were interested to see if there were additional benefits to combining it with Optaflexx, a product known to… Read More Want to learn more from KNG research? Give us your email address to be notified when we publish new Nutrition Notes articles.